I'm thinking it's a near thing.
My interpretation is that what he means by 'good for the world' is the Earth - the planet and by extension the beasties and people upon it. No communism involved. If your personal intention is to get yours and screw the rest of us, I'll just have to watch out for you.If you believe in individual freedom, then that quote is not for you. Who decides what is good for everybody? Or the quote: The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.
I answer to God, and I know what he thinks is good. I'll stick to that.
The essay doesn't actually espouse "collectivism". It doesn't advocate worshiping Gaia. It may suggest that countryfolk and urbanites have an interest in common - the world we live in AKA the planet we live on. If we don't accept that common interest . . . ah, might as well be talking to the maple tree behind my house; she's a good old gal, but she ignores me as well as she can.Me, too. Not a part of the borg collective.
You and Clint EastwoodThe essay doesn't actually espouse "collectivism". It doesn't advocate worshiping Gaia. It may suggest that countryfolk and urbanites have an interest in common - the world we live in AKA the planet we live on. If we don't accept that common interest . . . ah, might as well be talking to the maple tree behind my house; she's a good old gal, but she ignores me as well as she can.
Enter your email address to join: