Urge your State Lawmakers to OPPOSE Red Flag Gun Grabs...

Homesteading & Country Living Forum

Help Support Homesteading & Country Living Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

SHOOTER13

SNIPER
Neighbor
HCL Supporter
Joined
Nov 26, 2017
Messages
8,649
Location
PENNSYLVANIA
Urge your State Lawmakers to OPPOSE Red Flag Gun Grabs

New York-style gun control may be on its way to Pennsylvania, as FOUR similar, so-called “red flag” gun confiscation bills have been introduced in the state legislature.

Pennsylvania Democrats and RINO Republicans have teamed up to assault your constitutional rights.

The four bills and their sponsors are: SB 90 (Killion, R-9); SB 293 (Fontana, D-42); HB 1075 (Stephens, R-151); and HB 1028 (McCarter, D-154).

Here’s what GOA’s Legislative Counsel Michael Hammond has to say about red flag laws like these:

Under these bills, the police or an “angry ex” can petition a judge, requesting that you be stripped of your Second, Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Your accuser will be the ONLY ONE in the room.

They don’t have to demonstrate that you have committed a crime. They don’t have to demonstrate that there is any chance that you will ever commit a crime.

Rather, all they have to show is that you are — subjectively, “dangerous” to someone — and they only have to show the very low legal standard of “preponderance of the evidence.” That’s all it takes for you to be stripped of your constitutional rights.

And it doesn’t end there. We’ve had some experience with “petitions” like this. And, when only the hysterical accuser is present, a pliant judge will normally sign anything that is put before him.

In New Mexico, one judge issued a restraining order against Dave Letterman for supposedly sending coded messages to a New Mexico housewife, by way of her TV set.

So, after the pliant judge has given the okay to a request, you lose your constitutional rights with NO DUE PROCESS. The next thing that happens is that the police arrive at your door in the middle of the night, ready to ransack your house and, if you resist, to arrest or kill you.

If you think this couldn’t happen, you should consider the case of 60-year-old Gary Willis of Ferndale, Maryland, who was shot to death by police serving a “red flag” order at 5:17 a.m. — after he, not unreasonably, came to the door with a gun in his hand.

Sure, you’ll get a hearing in 10 days — where you can hire an attorney for thousands of dollars to try to convince the judge he made a mistake.

Or, your lawyer will be appointed by the court. And he will probably be a public defender with little or no experience and a huge caseload. And he will probably do his best to convince you that relinquishing all of your guns will be the best course of action.

But no matter. In circumstances like these, judges NEVER rule for the gun owner.

Even the ACLU branches in Pennsylvania and Rhode Island have issued memos in opposition to “red flag” laws. The Rhode Island branch offered a 14-page analysis detailing “some serious due process concerns.”

And those who believe late-night confrontations with police are more likely to produce fatal results for minorities might want to lay aside their hatred of guns — and consider where the suspension of due process might lead.

But, if you want to turn Pennsylvania gun ownership into some horrible nightmare, these bills are the vehicle to do just that.

So please take action and urge your state lawmakers to OPPOSE Red Flag Gun Grabs !!

In liberty,

Dr. Val Finnell
Pennsylvania Director
Gun Owners of America


https://gunowners.org/


.
 
I would be grateful if these politicians had the guts to live by the oath they swore when they enter office.

We wouldn't have these proposals.
 
I would be grateful if these politicians had the guts to live by the oath they swore when they enter office.
Most of them probably never read the Constitution. Just sayin'.

As a resident of New York State, appealing to government officials is a waste of time for me. But I encourage people in free states to do as much as they can to defeat this. But come what may, I encourage everyone to resist all unconstitutional laws. Remember: Ben Franklin was asked "What have you given us?" and he replied "A republic, if you can keep it." Well, keeping a constitutional republic means defending it when it's attacked. Do not allow anyone to take away your rights. It's scary to think this kind of talk is bordering on subversive, but that's an indicator we're in pretty deep.
 
The Red Flag laws are one of the few things that really scare me.
Leftist LOVE to weaponize Gov't against the people and this is perfect for them.
 
Individual leftists already like to purge people that are not them out of public life.
This gives them an additional powerful tool.

Its legalized SWATing and no matter the outcome its a win-win-win for the enemies our our republic:

a) If all goes smooth they have an ideological opponent off balance, spending all his energy and money getting his property back and so will now likely not donate or be politically active against them. Another outcome
b) is they get shot dead during the SWATing which is win for our enemies now there is one less conservative voter and/or activist.
or
c) he defends himself either thru confusion or intent and shot a LEO then thats an even greater win for the left since now there are TWO less conservative voters the cop and the raid victim AND they get to say "See, I told you conservatives/NRA members, GOA members etc etc" are dangerous extremists!". This narrative can then we weaponized even further by the enemy media and is self reinforcing.
 
Last edited:
I sat in a small forum of community leaders who were discussing a variety of topics, red flag laws came up. I was surprised how the local politicians (who are mostly independent or conservative) were unable to see the potential negative effects of such a law. As if they were polarized by the fictitious and yet apparently alluring potential of stopping an active shooter. Finally one of the city council people got up and spoke how he would never support such laws and neither would anyone with common sense. He talked about the potential of abuse by the worst of society and by elected officials, he talk about Trump derangement syndrome, he talked about how the left would just label anyone who did not fall into lock step with their ideology as red flag candidates, he talked about where it has been tried and how it failed, etc. That was the end of the discussion. I started the applause but a lot of people joined in. Far more than people who did not clap.
 
Things are starting to get scary
 
I will share the above cartoon
 

Latest posts

Back
Top